Dark reader addon7/1/2023 The results above were collected on a very simple website and generally represent the minimum per-page performance impact of a Chrome extension. The speed impact of a browser extension depends on the website opened by the user. While a few hundred milliseconds may not sound like much, if multiple extensions are installed this can have a significant impact on user experience. If you try to interact with the page during this time the response will feel sluggish.Įach of these browser extensions has been installed over a million times. It spends 368 milliseconds running code on every page you open. Many Chrome extensions have the ability to run extra code on every page you open, although well-built ones only run code where necessary.Īmong the 100 most popular Chrome extensions, Evernote Web Clipper has the biggest negative impact on performance. How do these browser performance results compare to last year's?.What happens if I have more than one extension installed?.How do ad blockers and privacy tools affect browser performance?.Want to find out if any of the extensions you use are slowing you down? Look up the extension here. On ad-heavy websites, ad blockers and privacy tools can greatly improve performanceĪs the performance impact varies between different websites, five different pages were included in the test: a simple test page,, , and news articles by The Independent and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.Popular extensions like Honey, Evernote Web Clipper, and Avira Browser Safety can have a significant negative impact on website speed.I am using Windows 10 X64 21H2, and I believe I was using LibreWolf 106.0.1 and Firefox 106.0.2 during the time of the hijacking.This report investigates how 1000 of the most popular Chrome extensions impact browser performance and end-user experience. Well, I believe the code below in the first and last image points to Dark Reader as being the culprit of the browser hijacking. Enumerations can be good or bad, but in this case, I believe the enumeration could have malicious intent. It looks like some enumeration of my browser and OS could be occurring. One could not click on a single element on the page without being hijacked, and redirected to Below are some screenshots of the code running in my browser when I was hijacked and redirected to The hijacking code in the first and last image appears to belong to Dark Reader, but i'm not sure about the code in the center image. I took some screen shots of some code from by browser at the time my browser (LibreWolf) was hijacked. I'm fairly certain that Dark Reader is at the very least a browser hijacker, since the hijacking stopped immediately after uninstalling Dark Reader (4 days ago). I looked at some code in my browser, and it appeared my browser was being enumerated for vulnerabilities. I also had unknown write and code execution attempts originating from my browser that were being blocked by AppGuard. It would work by hijacking every element and link on the website and redirecting it to various links on. It wasn't immediately obvious that Dark Reader was the culprit since it only happened when visiting certain sites, and I had to be actively using elements on the site for a few minutes before the hijacking would begin to occur. My browsers recently began getting hijacked when visiting certain sites after installing the extension Dark Reader on Firefox, Waterfox, and Librewolf.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |